Cloth vs. FFP2: which face masks protects best against Covid-19? | The Week

Oct 22, 2024

Some experts want respirator masks like those mandated in Germany to become the standard in UK

Mask wearing in schools and indoor public places has become a hotly debated topic across the world, but research shows face coverings do help reduce the spread of Covid-19.

To what extent masks offer protection depends on the quality and type, however. As the UK struggles to contain the Omicron variant, the government has advised that everyone aged 12 and over must wear a face mask in indoor public venues including secondary school classrooms and on public transport - rules that have reignited debate about which type to choose.

Why 19 July will not be the end for face masks From face masks to free school meals: Boris Johnson’s five biggest U-turns on Covid Is it safe to ditch face masks after ‘Freedom Day’?

Which masks are best?

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

In the initial stages of the pandemic, the UK public was urged not to buy surgical-grade masks used by health professionals, because of shortages of such protective gear. Surgical-grade masks are now more widely available and offer greater protection than standard cloth coverings.

But government regulations still “say little about the best kind of protection”, wrote Clare Horwell, professor of Geohealth at Durham University, in an article for The Guardian. The current guidance dates back to a time when Covid-19 was primarily thought to spread “within large droplets, emitted when someone sneezed or coughed”.

Yet we now know that the virus is mainly transmitted through tiny aerosol particles that can travel “metres on an infected person’s breath” and linger in the air for hours, Howell added.

Research has found that the masks that offer the highest level of protection to the wearer and people around them are FFP2 masks, with a similar type of respirator mask known as the N95 available in the US. Surgical FFP1 masks are also highly effective.

A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com

Studies suggest that FFP1 masks offer at least 80% efficiency in blocking aerosol particles. The World Health Organization has cited studies showing that the filtration systems of FFP2 and N95 masks are 94% and 95% effective respectively, if properly fitted. However, they tend to be non-reusable, so can be an expensive option.

FFP1, FFP2 and N95 masks not only protect the wearer but “dramatically reduce risk to others too”, wrote Cotswolds-based GP Mark Porter in an article for The Times. But he advised against the use of respirator masks with exhaust valves, on the basis that while they make breathing easier for the wearer, “they also increase aerosol production, potentially putting those around you at risk”, he said.

In Germany, the use of either an FFP1 or FFP2 masks while at work, in shops or travelling in public transport has been mandated since April. These masks are also required in all public places in France.

Experts say that if high-quality respirator masks are unavailable, medical-grade surgical masks are the next best option.

Dr Peter Chin-Hong, a specialist in infectious diseases at the University of California-San Francisco, told Quartz that “a baseline should be a surgical mask”. He added that “even in the hospital, I’m mainly wearing a surgical mask”.

True medical-grade masks are made of “three layers of nonwoven fabric typically made from plastic”, with filtration layers “sandwiched” in the middle, said CNN.

These masks will generally offer more protection than cloth masks alone, but “less than a tightly fitted respirator”.

Time to ditch cloth masks?

Although cloth masks have been found to be less effective than wearing respirator or surgical masks, they still offer a higher level of protection than using no mask at all.

Ashley Styczynski, an infectious disease fellow at Stanford University who recently co-authored a large-scale study looking at the efficacy of different types of masks, told Bloomberg that typically, cloth materials block “10%-30% of aerosol-sized particles that contribute to airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2” - far less than respirator masks such as FFP2s and N95s.

Styczynski and her colleagues at Stanford performed a study across 600 villages in Bangladesh, where they provided surgical masks to some of the villages and cloth masks to others to assess their real-world efficacy.

“When considering both types of masks together, we found a significant reduction in Covid-19. When we looked at each of the mask types separately, we found that surgical masks were especially effective in reducing Covid-19, though there was more uncertainty for cloth masks,” she said.

“It may be that we didn't see an effect of cloth masks on Covid-19 because fewer people were given cloths masks. However, both cloth and surgical masks significantly reduced Covid-like symptoms, suggesting that cloth masks offer some protection.”

Raina MacIntyre, head of the biosecurity research programme at the University of New South Wales in Australia, told Quartz that a “high-performing cloth mask” can be fashioned to effectively block droplets, using a combination of cotton/linen and polyester/nylon – to resemble the performance of surgical protection.

US public health agency the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said that the fit of either cloth or surgical masks can be improved by knotting the straps and tucking the sides. The rule of thumb is that a mask is generally a good fit if the wearer can feel warm air coming through the front of the mask as they inhale and exhale.

What about face shields?

Current UK government guidelines say that face visors or shields should only be worn in addition to a face covering, but not alone. According to official advice, “face visors or shields do not adequately cover the nose and mouth, and do not filter airborne particles”.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also does not recommend using face shields instead of masks, as it is “unclear how much protection shields provide” said Mayo Clinic. “If you must use a face shield instead of a mask, choose one that wraps around the sides of your face and extends below your chin,” the agency advised.

Today's NewspapersA roundup of the headlines from the US front pages

By The Week StaffPublished 22 October 24

Under the RadarThere have been 'at least 50' mysterious deaths of energy company executives since Putin ordered Ukraine invasion

By Harriet Marsden, The Week UKPublished 22 October 24

The Week RecommendsFinland's capital has an admirable mix of street art and museums

By Catherine Garcia, The Week USPublished 21 October 24

The ExplainerResearch could help scientists understand long-term effects of Covid-19 as well as conditions such as MS and dementia

By The Week UKPublished 8 October 24

Under the RadarLabels are leaving things out. And brands are highlighting only what they want to.

By Devika Rao, The Week USPublished 30 August 24

Speed readThe CDC recommends the new booster to combat the widely-circulating KP.2 strain

By Peter Weber, The Week USPublished 23 August 24

Today's Big QuestionSpread of potentially deadly sub-variant more like early days of HIV than Covid, say scientists

By The Week UKPublished 20 August 24

Speed ReadAn outbreak of the viral disease formerly known as monkeypox continues to spread in Africa

By Rafi Schwartz, The Week USPublished 15 August 24

The explainerThe condition affecting young women

By Devika Rao, The Week USPublished 31 July 24

The ExplainerUK was 'unprepared' for pandemic and government 'failed' citizens with flawed response, says damning report

By Harriet Marsden, The Week UKPublished 19 July 24

Under the RadarThe World Health Organization is also urging consumers to be cautious

By Justin Klawans, The Week USPublished 2 July 24